casestudymd.com pic of doctors
curve graphic home casestudies cme about us contact us
curvegraphic
curvegraphic

Clinical Cases in Coblation®-Assisted Tonsillectomy

Changing Indications for Chronic Tonsillitis

CASE 3 IN A SERIES

John E. McClay, M.D.
Assistant Professor
Pediatric Otolaryngology
Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery
University of Texas Southwestern Medical School
Children’s Hospital of Dallas

Editor: Roxane Baer
This program was supported by an educational
grant from Arthrocare Corporation in an effort
to encourage the advancement of clinical medical education.

Patient History

A 9-year-old boy began contracting sore throats associated with fever and lethargy at the age of 5 years. When he was 6 years old, he had four throat infections. During the past 2 years, he had five infections per year, which were documented with either a rapid streptococcal test or throat culture to verify the presence of group A betahemolytic streptococcus. He was treated with antibiotics for each infection, usually amoxicillin or amoxicillin/clavulanate. During a previous bout of pharyngotonsillitis, he had been treated with clindamycin for 2 weeks.

Although there were no signs of recent ear infections, symptoms of nasal obstruction were present. During the spring and fall, he had itchy, watery eyes and sneezing; however, his throat infections were not seasonal. He sometimes snored at night, which significantly worsened in the spring and fall. There were no signs of apneic pauses during sleep. He missed 2 to 3 days of school each time he developed pharyngotonsillitis. On presentation, he did not have subjective fever or sore throat. His past medical history was otherwise noncontributory.

Physical Examination

On physical examination, the patient was noted to be thin, healthy, well developed, and in no acute distress. He was in the 10th percentile for weight and 50th percentile for height. Craniofacially, his midface was elongated slightly, and infraorbital congestion was noted under his skin (so-called allergic shiners). His speech was slightly hyponasal and he breathed through his mouth. On otoscopic examination, the ears were clear. Nasal examination via anterior rhinoscopy revealed mild paleness and enlargement of the inferior turbinates, with no congestion or erythema seen in his middle meatus (the area between the middle turbinate and lateral nasal wall). Examination of the oral cavity and oropharynx showed bumpy, pale-yellowish lymphoid tissue on the posterior oropharyngeal wall and 2+ to 3+ symmetrical tonsils with irritated and globular medial borders. There was no erythema or edema of the tonsils or anterior tonsillar pillar. Examination of the neck revealed symmetrical, mildly enlarged lymph nodes (1.5 cm) in the jugulodigastric region of both sides of the neck.

Treatment Regimen

Based on the patient’s history of recurrent infections, he underwent tonsillectomy. In addition, because of the symptoms of obstruction of the nasal airway, the adenoids were evaluated intraoperatively and noted to be significantly enlarged,blocking 75% of the choana in the supine positionwith the palate elevated. Therefore, the adenoids also were removed. Prior to removal of the adenoids, the anterior tonsillar pillar and fossa were injected with Marcaine® with 1/100,000 epinephrine. The tonsils were removed via Coblation®. Coblation is a soft-tissue surgery system that uses low-temperature radiofrequency energy applied to a sterile solution to dissolve soft tissue. The adenoids were removed with a curette, and hemostasis was performed with suction electrocautery in the adenoid bed in the nasopharynx.

He was able to drink liquids and consume a soft diet throughout the postoperative course, but his condition worsened on days 5 to 7. On postoperative day 9, he was seen for a routine followup visit. His symptoms had improved, and the scabs in the tonsillar fossa had healed. The hypernasal speech he experienced for the first few days postoperatively had resolved. He still had mild nasal congestion and was prescribed a nasal saline spray and a topical nasal steroid spray. By 3 weeks postoperatively, the nasal congestion had resolved and all medicines were discontinued. At 6-month follow-up, there were no tonsillar infections.

Discussion

Tonsillectomy is one of the most commonly performed procedures in the United States. It is often combined with adenoidectomy. Historically, indications for removal of these lymphoid structures have been based on surgeons’ beliefs as well as certain diseases occurring in different eras. In the early part of the 1900s, during the preantibiotic area, tonsillectomy/ adenoidectomy was routinely performed when the tonsils and adenoids were considered to be reservoirs of infection. It was considered a treatment of anorexia, mental retardation, enuresis, or simply a good health practice.1 The tonsils were removed without regard to psychological preparation of the child or preoperative or postoperative instructions for the parents.2

In the 1930s and 1940s, the widespread use of tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy became controversial with the development of antimicrobial agents, such as sulfonamides and penicillins, prescribed to treat tonsillitis and adenoiditis. Several other factors involved in the decline in tonsillectomies included the recognition that there was a natural decrease in the incidence of upper respiratory infections as children became of school age; the publication of several studies showing that tonsillectomy/ adenoidectomy was ineffective; and the belief of an increased risk of developing poliomyelitis after tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy (prior to the development and use of the vaccine).3 Once the opinion pendulum began to swing to avoid surgery, prospective clinical trials were needed to prove to the medical and lay communities that appropriate indications for tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy existed.

In the 1960s and 1970s, data from nonrandomized or controlled studies of year-long prophylactic treatment with penicillin or sulfa antibiotics were compared with surgery or no treatment, with mixed results.4

In the early 1980s, Paradise and colleagues published the most cited studies on the rationale for tonsillectomy in children with recurrent sore throats.5 Their series demonstrated that children who had tonsillectomy performed for a strictly defined number of infections per year (three infections per year for 3 years, five infections per year for 2 years, or seven infections per year for 1 year) had a statistically significant decrease in the number of episodes of sore throats after tonsillectomy for 2 to 3 years, compared with a control group who had not undergone tonsillectomy. Other indications for tonsillectomy include persistent chronic tonsillitis lasting 3 months,2,6 recurrent peritonsillar abscess, and being a streptococcal carrier, especially when the family has a history of rheumatic fever.6

During the past 3 decades, the incidence of tonsillectomy has decreased from approximately 1.5 million times a year in the late 1960s7 to approximately 400,000 times a year in 1994.8 This decrease resulted in part from the declining incidence of tonsillectomy for chronic or recurrent infections when strict criteria are applied. Rosenfeld and Green pointed out this changing trend of indications for tonsillectomy in the 1980s.9 They reported the incidence of tonsillectomies for infections decreased by 20%, whereas the percentage of tonsillectomies performed for obstructive breathing increased from 0% to 19%. Since their study, the use of tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy for obstruction has continued to increase as it becomes more evident in younger children.

Clinical Pearls

The use of cautery for control of hemostasis in the tonsillar fossa seems to have an impact on the postoperative course, with increasing use causing more pain. However, the temperature used with Coblation is significantly lower than that used with standard cautery, and decreased heat should result in less patient discomfort postoperatively. Children whose tonsils are removed without cautery to control hemorrhage often have minimal pain postoperatively.

References

  1. Fry J: Are all ‘T’s and A’s really necessary?’
    BMJ 1957; 1:124-129.
  2. Deutsh ES : Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy:
    Changing indications. Pediatr Clin North Am
    1996;43:1319-1338.
  3. Paradise JL: Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy.
    In: Pediatric Otolaryngology, 3rd ed, Bluestone
    CD, Stool SE, Kenna MA, eds. Philadelphia, WB
    Saunders, 1996.
  4. Donovan R: Clinical and immunological studies
    on children undergoing tonsillectomy for repeated
    sore throats. Proc R Med Soc 1973;66:413-416.
  5. Paradise JL, Bluestone CD, et al: Efficacy of
    tonsillectomy for recurrent throat infections in
    severely affected children: Results of parallel randomized
    and nonrandomized clinical trials. N
    Engl J Med 1984;310:674-683.
  6. Darrow DH, Siemens C: Indications for tonsillectomy
    and adenoidectomy. Laryngoscope
    1990;99:187-191.
  7. Evans H: Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy:
    Review of published evidence for and against the
    T and A. Clin Pediatr 1968;7:71-75.
  8. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers
    for Disease Control: Advance data 283:
    Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 1994.
    National Center for Health Statistics. Available on
    the web at: www.cdc.gov/nchs
  9. Rosenfeld RM, Green RP: Tonsillectomy and
    adenoidectomy: Changing trends. Ann Otol
    Rhinol Laryngol 1990;99:187-191.

 

© 2004 The Willow Group
The educational programs that appear in casestudyMD.com are provided as a source of medical information. Participants are encouraged to use the information to enhance their own professional development. The techniques, procedures, medications, and other methods of diagnosis or treatment presented represent the experience of the author(s). The Willow Group, Inc. does not endorse this information as a guideline for patient management.